Weblog
Monday, 26 October 2009
-
Oh, I Want to See His Face!
First of all, let's clarify this little fact: The face of Jesus that we look forward to seeing--the one that all the saints in His presence enjoy--is nothing like the face that a few privileged souls saw when He was on earth. What was His face like on earth?
We know very little, and I less than others, but here's something: He was a Jew, so He looked like a Jew (darker skin, most likely black hair). He had "no form nor comeliness;" and when they saw Him, there was "no beauty that we should desire Him." Is. 53:2 In other words, He was plain and inglorious, and quite far from being handsome. I'm not minimizing how awesome it would have been to be near Him or look into His eyes, I'm simply noting how very unmajestic His earthly appearance was, to help contrast seeing Christ as He truly is, which will be shocking and terrifying.
I suppose I use the term "terrifying" in an older English way, that is, in a way not assuming that terrifying is evil or even negative. His works are "terrible" (Ps. 66:3-5); awesome, fearsome, terrible, terrifying.
We're talking about the face of the Beginning and the End! The only begotten Son of God, the Firstborn from the Dead, the Fullness of God! God's face, the face of faces!
His eyes are like a "flame of fire"; His head is brilliantly white, out-shining the blinding light of our little sun; from His mouth is a sharp two-edged sword (which honestly I don't know exactly what that means, but it's still awesome). And of course John, as I suppose I will, fell at His feet as dead, paralyzed with wonder and fear (which we know because Jesus' first words to him were "Fear not"). =)
In any other place than Glory, seeing His face would kill you. Moses was allowed to see God's glory pass by, except for His face! Whether that form was the Father or Son hardly seems to make a difference, because the light of knowing the glory of God is in the face of Jesus! 2Cor. 4:6
What else is in His face?
-Beauty!
Solomon's Songs offer an allegorical glimpse of Him:
"His head is as the most fine gold... His eyes are as the eyes of doves by the rivers of waters, washed with milk, and fitly set. His cheeks are as a bed of spices, as sweet flowers: his lips like lilies, dropping sweet smelling myrrh... His countenance is as Lebanon, excellent as the cedars. His mouth is most sweet: yea, he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved..." (SS 5:11-16)
-Depth
I can't imagine how "deep" His face is! How deep is He? It's not even a good question because He is outside of measurement. All of time and eternity is wrapped in Him. All the treasures of wisdom and knowledge are hid in Him. If everything else were to be abolished and disappear, this face would still remain! He is ageless, self-existent. Before there was anything else, there He was, and He has literally seen everything.
He has seen more agony than any number of people could ever suffer, because He had to see what no other Child of God ever had to: the rejection of His Father! "Forsaken" by Him, He said. What horrors He had to see!
Then His mouth tasted death for every man. (Heb. 2:9) That horrid potion procured by Adam and his seed was consumed all at once by Jesus. But His bitterness was not forever: "I am He who lives, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore..." Rev. 1:18
At His presence the sea fled, the Jordan was driven back, the mountains skipped away like rams and the hills like lambs (Ps. 114:3-7). Also the hills melt like wax (Ps. 97:5, Mic. 1:4); the mountains "flow down" at His presence (Is. 64:1-2), yet to see His face is to bear His presence! Are we stronger than oceans, hills, and mountains? Of course not, so He offers this Word: "For the mountains shall depart, and the hills be removed; but My kindness shall not depart from thee, neither shall the covenant of My peace be removed, saith the LORD that hath mercy on thee." Is. 54:10 He has to supernaturally preserve us just so that we can bear the sight of Him!
He distinguishes between every cell of our being. He can look straight through any cunning or show to see our very thoughts and intentions. Everything is laid bare before Him and nothing can be hidden. How personal are you willing to be with Him now? There will be no reserves when we stand before Him, wanted or unwanted.
His eyes are the windows into the Heart which is the source of all life; the heart that loves with greater breadth and vehemence than we could ever imagine; the love that compels Him to always live to intercede for us.
What about the joy in His face? "I will rejoice in Jerusalem, and joy in My people," He said. (Is.65:19) It was His pursuit of the joy laying ahead of Him that drove Him through His agony.
All of His magnitude and mysterious capacity which marvels us, if not completely shown in His face, is at least reflected in it. Thus, I can think of nothing more terrifying than to see Him, yet surely it will be the apex of any existence! It will be the most real thing there could ever be.
This is all only the tip of the iceberg, but even so I can hardly wait. I fell like I could hardly dare to look at Him if given the chance, nevertheless I crave the sight.
Charles Wesley wrote:
I cannot see Thy face and live-
Then let me see Thy face and die.
Dear Lord, my gasping spirit receive,
Give me on eagle's wings to fly.
A glimpse of love cannot suffice-
My soul for all Thy presence cries.
-----
What then? We will be like Him! Hallelujah! Seeing Him just as He is, without any glass, veil, mere representation-- nothing but absolute Life, with all that is in Him.
Excited yet? =)
Saturday, 15 August 2009
-
Government in Your House: Another Trojan in the Healthcare Bill
I was alarmed to hear yesterday that the proposed Universal Healthcare bill has in it inclusions for government workers to go to people's homes and evaluate the development of kids "under the age of school entry," among other ridiculous things. I wanted to see what the bill actually said, and the following is the exact text of the "home visitation" section. I never thought I would ever make a point to post something so boring, but this could be describing your future. Thanks to LarsLarson.com for the only link to the full text of the bill that I could find.
---------------------
838
SEC. 1904. GRANTS TO STATES FOR QUALITY HOME VISITATION PROGRAMS FOR FAMILIES WITH YOUNG CHILDREN AND FAMILIES EXPECTING CHILDREN.
Part B of title IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 621–629i) is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘Subpart 3—Support for Quality Home Visitation Programs
‘‘SEC. 440. HOME VISITATION PROGRAMS FOR FAMILIES WITH YOUNG CHILDREN AND FAMILIES EXPECTING CHILDREN.
‘‘(a) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this section is to improve the well-being, health, and development of children by enabling the establishment and expansion of high quality programs providing voluntary home visitation for families with young children and families expecting children.
‘‘(b) GRANT APPLICATION.—A State that desires to receive a grant under this section shall submit to the Secretary for approval, at such time and in such manner as the Secretary may require, an application for the grant that includes the following:
‘‘(1) DESCRIPTION OF HOME VISITATION PROGRAMS.—A description of the high quality programs of home visitation for families with young children and families expecting children that will be sup-
839
ported by a grant made to the State under this section, the outcomes the programs are intended to achieve, and the evidence supporting the effectiveness of the programs.
‘‘(2) RESULTS OF NEEDS ASSESSMENT.—The results of a statewide needs assessment that describes—
‘‘(A) the number, quality, and capacity of home visitation programs for families with young children and families expecting children in the State;
‘‘(B) the number and types of families who are receiving services under the programs;
‘‘(C) the sources and amount of funding provided to the programs;
‘‘(D) the gaps in home visitation in the State, including identification of communities that are in high need of the services; and
‘‘(E) training and technical assistance activities designed to achieve or support the goals of the programs.
‘‘(3) ASSURANCES.—Assurances from the State that—
‘‘(A) in supporting home visitation programs using funds provided under this section,
840
the State shall identify and prioritize serving communities that are in high need of such services, especially communities with a high proportion of low-income families or a high incidence of child maltreatment;
‘‘(B) the State will reserve 5 percent of the grant funds for training and technical assistance to the home visitation programs using such funds;
‘‘(C) in supporting home visitation programs using funds provided under this section, the State will promote coordination and collaboration with other home visitation programs (including programs funded under title XIX) and with other child and family services, health services, income supports, and other related assistance;
‘‘(D) home visitation programs supported using such funds will, when appropriate, provide referrals to other programs serving children and families; and
‘‘(E) the State will comply with subsection (i), and cooperate with any evaluation conducted under subsection (j).
841
‘‘(4) OTHER INFORMATION.—Such other information as the Secretary may require.
‘‘(c) ALLOTMENTS.—
‘‘(1) INDIAN TRIBES.—From the amount reserved under subsection (l)(2) for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall allot to each Indian tribe that meets the requirement of subsection (d), if applicable, for the fiscal year the amount that bears the same ratio to the amount so reserved as the number of children in the Indian tribe whose families have income that does not exceed 200 percent of the poverty line bears to the total number of children in such Indian tribes whose families have income that does not exceed 200 percent of the poverty line.
‘‘(2) STATES AND TERRITORIES.—From the amount appropriated under subsection (m) for a fiscal year that remains after making the reservations required by subsection (l), the Secretary shall allot to each State that is not an Indian tribe and that meets the requirement of subsection (d), if applicable, for the fiscal year the amount that bears the same ratio to the remainder of the amount so appropriated as the number of children in the State whose families have income that does not exceed 200 percent of the poverty line bears to the total number of
842
children in such States whose families have income that does not exceed 200 percent of the poverty line.
‘‘(3) REALLOTMENTS.—The amount of any alotment to a State under a paragraph of this subsection for any fiscal year that the State certifies to the Secretary will not be expended by the State pursuant to this section shall be available for reallotment using the allotment methodology specified in that paragraph. Any amount so reallotted to a State is deemed part of the allotment of the State under this subsection.
‘‘(d) MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT.—Beginning with fiscal year 2011, a State meets the requirement of this subsection for a fiscal year if the Secretary finds that the aggregate expenditures by the State from State and local sources for programs of home visitation for families with young children and families expecting children for the then preceding fiscal year was not less than 100 percent of such aggregate expenditures for the then 2nd preceding fiscal year.
‘‘(e) PAYMENT OF GRANT.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall make a grant to each State that meets the requirements of subsections (b) and (d), if applicable, for a fiscal year for which funds are appropriated under sub-
843
section (m), in an amount equal to the reimbursable percentage of the eligible expenditures of the State for the fiscal year, but not more than the amount allotted to the State under subsection (c) for the fiscal year.
‘‘(2) REIMBURSABLE PERCENTAGE DEFINED.— In paragraph (1), the term ‘reimbursable percentage’ means, with respect to a fiscal year—
‘‘(A) 85 percent, in the case of fiscal year 2010;
‘‘(B) 80 percent, in the case of fiscal year 2011; or
‘‘(C) 75 percent, in the case of fiscal year 2012 and any succeeding fiscal year.
‘‘(f) ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In this section, the term ‘eligible expenditures’—
‘‘(A) means expenditures to provide voluntary home visitation for as many families with young children (under the age of school entry) and families expecting children as practicable, through the implementation or expansion of high quality home visitation programs that—
844
‘‘(i) adhere to clear evidence-based models of home visitation that have demonstrated positive effects on important program-determined child and parenting outcomes, such as reducing abuse and neglect and improving child health and development;
‘‘(ii) employ well-trained and competent staff, maintain high quality supervision, provide for ongoing training and professional development, and show strong organizational capacity to implement such a program;
‘‘(iii) establish appropriate linkages and referrals to other community resources and supports;
‘‘(iv) monitor fidelity of program implementation to ensure that services are delivered according to the specified model; and
‘‘(v) provide parents with—
‘‘(I) knowledge of age-appropriate child development in cognitive, language, social, emotional, and motor domains (including knowledge of sec-
845
ond language acquisition, in the case of English language learners);
‘‘(II) knowledge of realistic expectations of age-appropriate child behaviors;
‘‘(III) knowledge of health and wellness issues for children and parents;
‘‘(IV) modeling, consulting, and coaching on parenting practices;
‘‘(V) skills to interact with their child to enhance age-appropriate development;
‘‘(VI) skills to recognize and seek help for issues related to health, developmental delays, and social, emotional, and behavioral skills; and
‘‘(VII) activities designed to help parents become full partners in the education of their children;
‘‘(B) includes expenditures for training, technical assistance, and evaluations related to the programs; and
‘‘(C) does not include any expenditure with respect to which a State has submitted a claim
846
for payment under any other provision of Federal law.
‘‘(2) PRIORITY FUNDING FOR PROGRAMS WITH STRONGEST EVIDENCE.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The expenditures, described in paragraph (1), of a State for a fiscal year that are attributable to the cost of programs that do not adhere to a model of home visitation with the strongest evidence of effectiveness shall not be considered eligible expenditures for the fiscal year to the extent that the total of the expenditures exceeds the applicable percentage for the fiscal year of the allotment of the State under subsection (c) for the fiscal year.
‘‘(B) APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE DEFINED.—In subparagraph (A), the term ‘applicable percentage’ means, with respect to a fiscal year—
‘‘(i) 60 percent for fiscal year 2010;
‘‘(ii) 55 percent for fiscal year 2011;
‘‘(iii) 50 percent for fiscal year 2012;
‘‘(iv) 45 percent for fiscal year 2013; or
‘‘(v) 40 percent for fiscal year 2014.
847
‘‘(g) NO USE OF OTHER FEDERAL FUNDS FOR STATE MATCH.—A State to which a grant is made under this section may not expend any Federal funds to meetthe State share of the cost of an eligible expenditure for which the State receives a payment under this section.
‘‘(h) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may waive or modify the application of any provision of this section, other than subsection (b) or (f), to an Indian tribe if the failure to do so would impose an undue burden on the Indian tribe.
‘‘(2) SPECIAL RULE.—An Indian tribe is deemed to meet the requirement of subsection (d) for purposes of subsections (c) and (e) if—
‘‘(A) the Secretary waives the requirement; or
‘‘(B) the Secretary modifies the requirement, and the Indian tribe meets the modified requirement.
‘‘(i) STATE REPORTS.—Each State to which a grant is made under this section shall submit to the Secretary an annual report on the progress made by the State in addressing the purposes of this section. Each such report shall include a description of—
848
‘‘(1) the services delivered by the programs that received funds from the grant;
‘‘(2) the characteristics of each such program, including information on the service model used by the program and the performance of the program;
‘‘(3) the characteristics of the providers of services through the program, including staff qualifications, work experience, and demographic characteristics;
‘‘(4) the characteristics of the recipients of services provided through the program, including the number of the recipients, the demographic characteristics of the recipients, and family retention;
‘‘(5) the annual cost of implementing the program, including the cost per family served under the program;
‘‘(6) the outcomes experienced by recipients of services through the program;
‘‘(7) the training and technical assistance provided to aid implementation of the program, and how the training and technical assistance contributed to the outcomes achieved through the program;
‘‘(8) the indicators and methods used to monitor whether the program is being implemented as designed; and
849
‘‘(9) other information as determined necessary by the Secretary.
‘‘(j) EVALUATION.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall, by grant or contract, provide for the conduct of an independent evaluation of the effectiveness of home visitation programs receiving funds provided under this section, which shall examine the following:
‘‘(A) The effect of home visitation programs on child and parent outcomes, including child maltreatment, child health and development, school readiness, and links to community services.
‘‘(B) The effectiveness of home visitation programs on different populations, including the extent to which the ability of programs to improve outcomes varies across programs and populations.
‘‘(2) REPORTS TO THE CONGRESS.—
‘‘(A) INTERIM REPORT.—Within 3 years after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Congress an interim report on the evaluation conducted pursuant to paragraph (1).
850
‘‘(B) FINAL REPORT.—Within 5 years after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Congress a final report on the evaluation conducted pursuant to paragraph (1).
‘‘(k) ANNUAL REPORTS TO THE CONGRESS.—The Secretary shall submit annually to the Congress a report on the activities carried out using funds made available under this section, which shall include a description of the following:
‘‘(1) The high need communities targeted by States for programs carried out under this section.
‘‘(2) The service delivery models used in the programs receiving funds provided under this section.
‘‘(3) The characteristics of the programs, including—
‘‘(A) the qualifications and demographic characteristics of program staff; and
‘‘(B) recipient characteristics including the number of families served, the demographic characteristics of the families served, and family retention and duration of services.
‘‘(4) The outcomes reported by the programs.
851
‘‘(5) The research-based instruction, materials, and activities being used in the activities funded under the grant.
‘‘(6) The training and technical activities, including on-going professional development, provided to the programs.
‘‘(7) The annual costs of implementing the programs, including the cost per family served under the programs.
‘‘(8) The indicators and methods used by States to monitor whether the programs are being been implemented as designed.
‘‘(l) RESERVATIONS OF FUNDS.—From the amounts appropriated for a fiscal year under subsection (m), the Secretary shall reserve—
‘‘(1) an amount equal to 5 percent of the amounts to pay the cost of the evaluation provided for in subsection (j), and the provision to States oftraining and technical assistance, including the dissemination of best practices in early childhood home visitation; and
‘‘(2) after making the reservation required by paragraph (1), an amount equal to 3 percent of the amount so appropriated, to pay for grants to Indian tribes under this section.
852
‘‘(m) APPROPRIATIONS.—Out of any money in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there is appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section—
‘‘(1) $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2010;
‘‘(2) $100,000,000 for fiscal year 2011;
‘‘(3) $150,000,000 for fiscal year 2012;
‘‘(4) $200,000,000 for fiscal year 2013; and
‘‘(5) $250,000,000 for fiscal year 2014.
‘‘(n) INDIAN TRIBES TREATED AS STATES.—In this section, paragraphs (4), (5), and (6) of section 431(a) shall apply.’’.
Saturday, 06 June 2009
-
Christian Singles: Our Interaction
To my fellow unwed saints (a.k.a Christian singles) I submit the following discourse about our relationship to each other. I'm praying that it will magnify Christ's preeminence and will be used by Him to strengthen His Body.
"(By Jesus we) believe in God, who raised Him up from the dead, and gave Him glory; that your faith and hope might be in God.
"Seeing ye have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit unto unfeigned (not pretended, sincere) love of the brethren, see that you agape one another with a pure heart intensely:
"Being born again... by the word of God, which lives and abides for ever." 1 Pet. 1:21-23
How much "love of the brethren" should we be content with? Does the current paradigm of single's relationships fit in with this passage?
Something to keep in mind as we address this: In Titus 2 it says, "Young women... be sober. Young men... be sober." (v.4 and 6) Keep a sound mind. Keep your head on straight. You have to consciously decide not to let your mind react and jump to conclusions and read-in to things what you like or dislike.
____
Here is a passage that comes up a lot in discussions about young people's relationships, but I bring it up because it has more relevance than one might initially think:
2 Tim. 2:22 "Flee also youthful lusts: but follow righteousness, faith, love, peace, with them that call on the Lord from out of a clean heart."
We tend to see "lust" as a strong word--and it is--but this doesn't just mean "lust" as "an intense fleshly craving"-- it really means "the desires and longings pertaining to youth." This opens it up to include a lot more than we might normally expect. To us youth who read this, God is saying, "I want you to leave the longings that are natural to your age, and flee toward something else..."
So God wants us to relate to our desires in a way that is not normal for people our age. To "act our age" would be to settle for too little. Our relatively young age is no excuse to desire (internal) as other youths desire, even if we behave (external) with wisdom beyond our years. The effect this has on how we view our fellow single Believers is huge!
The "something else:" "...Run after (pursue) righteousness, faith, agape, peace, with those who call on the Lord from out of a clean heart."
WHAT IF: Instead of looking at fellow singes as "potential" or "possibilities" for marriage, what if we all viewed each other as adventurers daring and racing and struggling and pressing to see how much righteousness, how much faith, how much agape (love of loves!), and how much unified rest in God we can collectively grasp? What if that running and endeavoring together was unencumbered by the wondering and suspicions and labeling and comparing and evaluating and otherwise "prospecting" that is found even among Christian singles?
What I'm saying is that looking around at ourselves and the world at present is no way to gauge how well we're doing at having a godly perspective of singlehood and our fellow single saints. We can't judge ourselves by the way things are. The idea is not "how much can we Christianize the normal thought processes of youth," but rather suppose we threw out the normal way of relating to singles and gaining a spouse, replace that with the above goals of righteousness, faith etc., and let God define what real interaction among singles really looks like from there.
I'm hardly an expert on the issue, but I can say that God has succeeded in accomplishing a great deal of freedom in me, so I can at least describe what God has done for me:
We are primarily related to one another as being "in Christ." Jesus is the everything of our bond and unity. He is the definition of our interaction. We are "members of one body, of His flesh and of His bones" (Eph. 5:30)! God's family-- spiritual siblings.
It seems like everyone knows this, but few really really really act like it. I don't always act like it.
Suppose we all believe that our spiritual siblings are really and truly just that. Would you go looking among your siblings for a spouse? People take offense at this thought because we know "the future": we know that God has designed and will call almost everyone to marriage at some point.
But wait! Why should the fact that God designed you for marriage change how you view other believers? Again, we don't relate to one another as marriage potential, we relate to one another as children of God, and this is exactly how it should stay until God specifically (that is, of a specific individual) says otherwise. Let us enjoy the power of being One Body without the normal he/she games of young adults.
Okay. But there's still the fact that God has designed you to be the husband or wife of someone, somewhere out there, at some time. I'm not saying to try to abolish the thought, that would be foolish-- God never ignores the obvious or denies the truth, so why would we? So of course, seek God for His will in everything and obey Him, because in this process He breaks and molds and builds and recreates exactly the person that He wants you to be, including exactly the spouse He wants you to be. Considering all of the work and love He puts into each person and His desire for godly individuals, families, and marriages, don't you think that He of all persons is most concerned about you meeting the right one (the only one!) at the right time, and proceeding at the right time?
But how do you keep that from altering you view of your precious spiritual siblings and reverting to "prospecting" mode? Friends, it's not as complicated as it may seem: Of all those siblings--and you may know hundreds of them--how many will actually eventually be you husband or wife? Except for rare cases, the answer is "one", obviously. While this number is extremely important when the time comes, when compared to the plethora of saints that we share this world with, it's hardly anything-- practically nothing. Remember, we view each other not by the fact that two saints will wed someday, but that we are all brothers and sisters now! "But brothers and sisters don't marry!" Indeed, so God has to prepare two of these siblings to become exceptions. Aha! An exception! Thus, guys, we need never to think, "She must be one of these," because we know that no one we know is her, until God says so. And until God reveals that He has some special intentions for you and someone else, you know every sister as a sister and nothing else. Gals, it's the same thing with guys. Until God makes one case different, you can know and believe that none of the brothers you know are the one, because effectively that is the case. Let yourself see us brothers as having no potential to be your husband, rather knowing us in the context of God's Body and helping the whole Body in the pursuit of His kingdom and righteousness as the laborers with Christ that we all already are. (1Cor. 3:9) "Won't that make you blind to seeing the right one?" Not at all! What better state to be in for God to make His will evident than while we have a gloriously objective view of the opposite gender?
I've been repeating terms like "God says" or "God's doing" or "God's intentions." This directly addresses the root of the critical issue: What do we believe is the criteria necessary to investigate a deeper relationship? Ultimately it all boils down to God's voice. Our nature and the world tells us that we have to check everyone out and find someone (uggh, "someone" is so unspecific!) who is attractive and is most compatible with our beliefs and/or personality, and now there is no end of "Christianized" ways to do this. But friends! all of those things are subjective! The recognition of your life's partner cannot be based on things that are so variable. Let me emphasize: You cannot recognize your future husband or wife based on how wise your person in question is, how intelligent they are, how they make you feel, how much you have in common, how conservative they are, how unconventional they are, how "right" they are; neither how responsible and leaderly he is, or how lovely and submissive she is; not even how godly or virtuous they are, or how physically beautiful they are. That's right, not even godliness or looks are the determining factors. This is hard, because of course we all want to see these things; they're all good. Nonetheless, while these elements should and most likely will be present in your spouse of God's choosing, above and beyond any reason we have to be specially attracted to somebody, the only truly determining factor is always God's voice. Sure, He uses all sorts of ways to make His will clear, but no matter which way, the reality of Him speaking in your spirit must be there. That's it. The buck stops there. This also forces us to consider why we pursue Christ-likeness: is it to know Him and love the coming of His kingdom and health of His body, or merely to gain virtues that make us attractive to other people?
But what if God doesn't say? What if He doesn't tell us in time (ahem, "our" time)? Can't we just decide for ourselves? Can't we follow our feelings and circumstances just this once? What if every desired factor is there except for the little intuitive voice of God? can't we believe that He set it up and wants us to act without Him saying so? No! We dare not! "Never move until the cloud moves," a wise man once told me. Do we dare believe that He must direct us in our spirit? We must believe it-- this is what trusting God is. Trusting God for a spouse doesn't mean that we go around on a mission to get married, and then "trust" Him to bless our carnal efforts by giving us a "good one". Trusting Him for a spouse means trusting that He knows just the right one, trusting that while we obey Him He'll cause us to meet that person at just the right time, trusting that He'll tell us that this is "the one" at just the right time, trusting that He'll tell us to "go for it" at just the right time, trusting that He has already been working or will then work on the party of interest to bring the needed response, trusting that He-- huh, it's like you have to trust Him every step of the way! Imagine that.
And every step of the way requires us to trust Him for something outside of our control. We really make it hard on ourselves when we try to take God's responsibilities into our own hands. Now obviously, when He does speak, He's giving us the responsibility to obey, and we better act on His direction! But until then, we have no recourse. We are entirely at His mercy-- we are impotent without Him. Our expectation is only from Him. (haha, "only"!
) He is very merciful. "I am poor and needy, yet the Lord thinks upon me"! Ps.40:17a
Finally, look at this complementary role of spiritual siblings, whether wed or unwed: "Let us consider one another to incite agape and good works: ...exhorting one another: and so much the more..." Heb. 10:24-25 Yes, our interaction should be such as regularly incites something: love that is unmixed with intent of personal gain, and good ("beautiful, virtuous") works, and we should be doing so more and more!
To summarize:
As brothers and sisters, let's see how much of God we can find together, and do so without the usual distraction common among unmarried youth. Let's not consider one another as marriage potential, but rather interact in a way so as to provoke godly love (and tons of it!) for God and His Body, knowing that our spouse will be the exception to the fact that everyone else is designed to be someone else's partner, not ours. The reality of God speaking in our spirit is the only true and final criterion for knowing the who/when/how of getting to know our future spouse. He is absolutely trustworthy to fulfill each of His roles, which are all beyond our control.
Blessings on all of you, and may His bride be all that He desires!
Friday, 01 May 2009
-
"I Have Learned the Wondrous Secret"
by
A.B. Simpson
(The version I'm familiar with omits the refrain; either way, this is a refreshingly powerful and biblically sound song! May each line be true in our belief and experience.)
1. I have learned the wondrous secret
Of abiding in the Lord;
I have found the strength and sweetness
Of confiding in His word;
I have tasted life’s pure fountain,
I am drinking of His blood,
I have lost myself in Jesus,
I am sinking into God.
* Refrain:
I’m abiding in the Lord,
And confiding in His word,
And I’m hiding, safely hiding,
In the bosom of His love.
2. I am crucified with Jesus,
And He lives and dwells in me,
I have ceased from all my struggling,
’Tis no longer I but He;
All my will is yielded to Him,
And His Spirit reigns within,
And His precious blood each moment
Keeps me cleansed and free from sin.
3. All my cares I cast upon Him,
And He bears them all away;
All my fears and griefs I tell Him,
All my needs from day to day.
All my strength I draw from Jesus,
By His breath I live and move;
E’en His very mind He gives me
And His faith and life and love.
4. For my words I take His wisdom,
For my works His Spirit’s pow’r,
For my ways His gracious presence
Guards and guides me every hour;
Of my heart He is the Portion,
Of my joy the ceaseless Spring,
Savior, Sanctifier, Keeper,
Glorious Lord and loving King.
Tuesday, 11 November 2008
-
"Behold... that it is I, Myself"
So two men were glumly talking about all of the recent events: how that Jesus, whom they thought would redeem Israel, had been sent to death by their very own rulers and priests; and that now of all times, the third day afterward, they and the other apostles were astounded and amazed to hear from the women that Jesus' body was gone from the grave, and that an angel had told them that He was alive. These guys were thoroughly perplexed by the whole situation and were trying (quite masculinely) to reason it all out on their way to Emmaus. Their disbelief (Lk. 24:11, 25) in the lady disciple's report of the fact that Jesus was again alive left them visibly sullen (v.17).
What better time for "Jesus Himself" to enter the conversation?
(I hope you're noticing all of the practical parallels, because they're really beautiful!)
At this critical point of turmoil, disappointment, disbelief, and mental taxation, "Jesus Himself drew near, and went (that is, journeyed together) with them." (24:15) Bless God!
At the time, they didn't even recognize Him, because their eyes were held/kept/restained from knowing that it was Him (v.16); as tragic as that is, it didn't keep God from His intentions!
Have you ever thought that you have to know and understand and recognize God's action in order for Him to be able to act in you? This passage clearly demonstrates that, while He desires and demands our recognition, He doesn't require it* for His own intentions to be enabled; coincidentally, some of His intentions are that He make Himself recognized! (Mat. 11:27, Gal. 1:15-16, Jn. 15:26, 17:1 etc.)
*On one hand, that is. Sometimes God does limit His action to man's obedience, but in this case we are talking about knowledge. God works whether or not people know it-- He works through their belief, and if they don't believe, He works to get them to believe; He doesn't always work whether or not they obey, i.e. "...often I would have... but you would not!" (Mat. 23:27)
Jesus asked about them-- what they were talking about, why they were sad. Jesus wanted them to tell Him about what was going on in their life. He even implied ignorance with His further question, "What things?", but this was only a means to hear (not necessarily "know", because He already knew) more about what was troubling them; this way, it would be abundantly clear to them when each of these issues were addressed and resolved by Him.
Ever had that happen? You knew that God truly wanted to hear from you--and wanted you to want to speak to Him, and hear Him--yet afterward you realized that He was also using your words to set up His coups de grâce-- His spike, His slam, His knockout punch. Jesus is the master of the art of letting others build up to their own downfall, that is, a "downfall" executed by His gloriously dismembering Truth (Heb. 4:12)-- so of course this kind of downfall is the best possible outcome!
He then expounded (Strong's: "explained thoroughly, interpreted") to them in all the scriptures the things about Himself! Jesus reveals Himself in the Word. All of it.
This kindled the men's hearts; Jesus was burning them with His Words. He was adding fuel to the fire before dropping what I'll call the "A-bomb of revelation". But notice: they were learning about Him, from things concerning Him; He was teaching them all about Himself, and explaining away their mental obstructions, yet they still didn't recognize Him! Their eyes were still dull-- something was missing, something still had to happen. They were ever learning, but still not coming to know the Truth (2Tim.3:7).
So they finally make it to town, now smarter, with greater understanding and heart-burn. It then looked as though Jesus is going to keep going, that is, remove or depart. What tragic implications! They had literally come this far, and now what? is that it?
Bravo on those men. They would have nothing of it! The day simply cannot end like this! So they "constrained Him, saying, Abide with us..." (.29)
Yes! That is exactly what Jesus wanted to hear! "And He went in to abide with them." They asked according to His will, and it was done to them.
Now. What if (I love "what-ifs"!), what if they had not compelled Jesus to stay with them? Do you think He would've said, "Oh, actually, y'know, I think I'll stay here after all." Of course not! Everything for them had led up to this point, and if they had been content with just the warm-feeling teaching from Jesus, they would have certainly missed Him! They would have missed Him!
How many times have I found some cool scripture and said "Wow!" ...and that was it? What does Jesus say to us? Effectively, "When I knock, you must open in order for Me to come in and dine with you." (Rev.3:20) Don't be content to hear Jesus knocking! "Oh isn't that nice, Jesus is knocking." No! It means He wants something more! We must give Him His place! I would go so far as to say that if you sense Jesus' presence, (*knock knock*...) it's not so that you can sense His presence! It's to tell you to do something, whether it means going somewhere secluded or right where you are, to put aside all else and constrain Jesus to come in and stay! To entertain Him.
Then, they ate with Jesus.
(The bay doors opened, the trigger was armed...)
And now Jesus came upon His goal. He, the Bread of Life, the Manna, took bread; He blessed, He broke, and He gave to them. This time He didn't have to say, "This is My body;" and when He gave to them, their eyes were thoroughly opened! and they knew Him!
Kaboom! A direct hit! The revelation of the Son of God!
I don't know what Jesus looked like before He disappeared, but we know that God loves it when His Christ scores a resounding victory.
Recognizing Jesus changes plans. It also changes sleep habits. These guys weren't going to stay in Emmaus-- they were out of there, right back to Jerusalem where they had come from.
"The Lord is risen indeed!" Jesus is really alive! He's up and about! We saw Him! This was their cry to their fearful (Jn.20:19) brethren.
With such a bold claim, who better to show up to validate it but, again, "Jesus Himself"!
Now, I know what you gals are thinking: "Why didn't He do this earlier when the women brought the very same message?" Hey, don't ask me. lol
So here was a group of disciples, most of whom didn't live in light of the fact that their Lord was alive. Then, even when they see Him, they don't believe it's really Him, so even though He says "Peace," they're terrified. Why were they terrified? They thought He was a ghost. Can you blame them? Imagine if the ghost of a friend that recently died showed up in the middle of the room! That'd be so freaky! Their fears were falsely based because of course, Jesus was no ghost; so we see that they recognized His appearance, but failed to understand His composition-- what He was made out of. They thought He was merely a visible spirit, when really He was flesh and blood; they had a foundational misunderstanding of His body; they didn't realize how much more of Him there was than they assumed.
It was time for another A-bomb.
"Why are you agitated? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts?" That word thoughts in Greek is dialogismos-- discussion, (mental) consideration, debate, doubting, etc.
So in other words, "Why are you so mixed up? why are you full of doubtful reasoning?" What was His answer to this?
"Behold My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself: handle Me, and see; for a spirit has not flesh and bones, as ye see Me have."
Look at Me! Look and see that I am who I am. It's really Me! Touch Me, verify Me.
Was there ever such a beautiful command! This is like candy to me; it's so good, it seems like it must be unhealthy, but this is God talking! I didn't write this!
But they still couldn't believe it. It seemed too good to be true. So He asked them if they had any food. Is it just me, or does Jesus really like to reveal Himself with food?
Why did Jesus ask for food?
Well, that's simple: hours before He had given away His bread and left right in the middle of dinner! Why wouldn't He ask for food?
Seriously though, He was hungry, and He sought a form of satisfaction from His people. Wow.
What was He hungry for? Peter's broiled special with a side of John's memorial honeycomb? Oh boy, it's obviously getting late, and I need to wrap this up...
He was hungry for His real food: doing His Father's will and finishing His work, Jn.4:34. What is the will of God that Jesus is hungry to accomplish? Our deliverance (Gal.1:4), and our sanctification (1Thes.4:3), to name a few. What is the work of God that Jesus is hungry to do? That we believe in this very Jesus! (Jn.6:29)
So Jesus asks His disciples, "Have you any food (and we infer) for Me?" What do we have to give this hungering Jesus, that He may do His Father's will and finish His work?
"Well, of course I have nothing to offer God..."
Wrong! Read the Bible! Rom. 12:1 for starters.
"Well, I mean, nothing God would want..."
Do you think that God would ever tell you to give Him something if He didn't want it?
There they were; shocked disciples, and Jesus sitting there eating in front of them, screaming inside Himself, "Look how symbolic this is!!"
He continued to say that This is what I was telling you about all that time!
Then He opened their understanding!
But wait, this seems backwards from the earlier meeting with the two men; first He had used scripture, then revealed Himself, and now He revealed Himself, then used scripture. Why?
People have different impediments to a complete relationship with God. Some don't recognize Him, but learn a lot about Him; others seem familiarized with Him, but don't realize how alive and active He is, and reel when He obliterates their box with something unexpected and deeper. Some are confused, some just don't believe everything they need to. Yet no matter what the case,
Jesus finds His food-- and He eats it, with pleasure.
- browse entries:
- older »
Top Tags - Weblog
[no tags]
Connect
Weblog Archives
Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save"
above and refresh the page.
About Me
[no info]
Subscriptions
Pulse
-
On the third day God made the apricot tree after its kind, and the peanut plant after its kind, and He saw that it was good!











Chatboard (0)